Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About CPSC Recalls
Questions and answers for manufacturers, importers, distributors, and retailers of consumer products in the United States
-
When a company reports a safety issue to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the recall process begins with the company submitting a report detailing the nature of the defect, any associated hazards, reported incidents or injuries, and the number of affected units. This report can be submitted through the SaferProducts.gov portal or directly to the agency. The CPSC then reviews the report, investigates the potential risks, and determines whether the product poses a substantial hazard. During this stage, the company may be required to provide additional data or conduct internal testing to aid in the assessment. If a recall is deemed necessary, the company and the CPSC collaborate to negotiate the terms.
Most recalls are voluntary, meaning the company works with the CPSC to develop a Corrective Action Plan (CAP). This plan outlines how consumers will be notified, whether through press releases, social media, or direct outreach, and specifies the remedies available, such as refunds, repairs, or replacements. Once the recall is officially announced, the CPSC publicizes it through its website, news outlets, and social media, while the company ensures effective consumer notification and product retrieval. Throughout the recall process, the CPSC monitors compliance, requiring the company to submit progress reports detailing how many consumers have been contacted and how many defective products have been addressed.
If the recall is successfully executed, the CPSC may close the case, but if the company fails to comply, the agency has the authority to take legal action, which may include fines or a mandatory recall. Proper adherence to the recall process helps protect consumers and mitigates risks associated with defective products. Would you like guidance on preparing for a recall or best practices for consumer communication?
-
Almost all recalls conducted in cooperation with the the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) are voluntary. Companies typically understand the benefits of quickly removing potentially dangerous or non-compliant products from the marketplace to protect the health and safety of their consumers and the value and reputation of their brand.
Some companies choose not to engage with the CPSC or dispute the CPSC’s technical findings or recommendations. in those cases, the CPSC can choose to bring an administrative lawsuit to enforce a mandatory recall. However, since litigation is costly and time-consuming, the CPSC will often resort to using public pressure to bring about a recall through the use of “Product Safety Warnings”, also known as unilateral press releases. Such actions can be harmful to the company’s brand and, increasingly, to the ability of the company to continue to operate and sell on major websites and platforms. Retailers and platforms prefer to cooperate with the CPSC and, even if a company chooses not to conduct a voluntary recall, a company’s listing may be shut down and/or a company may be banned from selling on a website or online marketplace.
-
No, not all recall necessarily require providing refund to consumers. It is often acceptable to engineer and provide a repair part or a full replacement instead of a full refund.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) does not mandate a specific remedy action for all recalls. According to the law, a company can choose between offering a refund, repair, or a replacement product.
For a recall to be conducted by a company in cooperation with the CPSC, however, the CPSC must review the proposed repair or replacement and agree that it is adequate.
If the CPSC disagrees with the company and does not approve the company’s proposed remedy, such as a product repair or replacement, the company can propose alternative remedies, such as a product replacement or a product refund.
If, however, the CPSC disagrees with the company and the company does not offer an alternative choice, the CPSC may seek to force the company to act.
The CPSC may threaten a company with a potential lawsuit to enforce a mandatory recall. or the CPSC may use public pressure to bring about a recall through the use of “Product Safety Warnings”, also known as unilateral press releases. Such actions can be harmful to the company’s brand and, increasingly, to the ability of the company to continue to operate and sell on major websites and platforms. Retailers and platforms prefer to cooperate with the CPSC and, even if a company chooses not to conduct a voluntary recall, a company’s listing may be shut down and/or a company may be banned from selling on a website or online marketplace.
-
Recalls happen frequently. There are typically between 250-350 recalls a year in the United States. The vast majority of companies are able to afford the recall and do not go bankrupt. Because companies can choose to repair or replace products, all recalls do not involve a full refund of the purchase price. Oftentimes, consumers no longer have a recalled product in their possession. Because the purpose of a recall is to remove a dangerous product, if a consumer no longer has a product, then the consumer is not entitled to a refund of the product.
-
When a company conducts a recall, typically in cooperation with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), retailers and online marketplaces must stop all sales of the product. The sale of a recalled product is against federal law.
Once retailers and online marketplaces have followed their processes and returned all recalled product to the company, sales of non-recalled versions of the products may resume.
Typically, retailers and online marketplaces understand that recalls happen and continue doing business with the manufacturer. Retailers and online marketplaces may make sure that extra safety measures are in place to prevent a reoccurance or another recall.
-
Almost all recalls conducted in cooperation with the the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) are
-
Yes. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) does require the use of social media in most recalls in order to help ensure the widest possible distribution of the recall message to potentially affected consumers.
There are some situations where, for example, a company can contact 100% of purchasers where social media may not be required. This is increasingly the case for electronic products with apps or where over-the-air software updates can correct the issue.
-
Recalls happen frequently. There are typically between 250-350 recalls a year in the United States. The vast majority of companies are able to afford the recall and do not go bankrupt. Because companies can choose to repair or replace products, all recalls do not involve a full refund of the purchase price. Oftentimes, consumers no longer have a recalled product in their possession. Because the purpose of a recall is to remove a dangerous product, if a consumer no longer has a product, then the consumer is not entitled to a refund of the product.
-
The Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) requires a manufacturer, importer, distributor, or retailer to report a product to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) when it has information about a product that “reasonably supports the conclusion” that
(i) the product fails to comply with “any ... rule, regulation, standard, or ban” enforced by the CPSC; or that
(ii) the product “contains a defect which could create a substantial product hazard,”; or that
(iii) the product creates an “unreasonable risk of serious injury or death.”
-
Companies are required to notify CPSC “immediately” upon receiving information that triggers a reporting obligation.
CPSC interprets “immediately” to be within 24 hours after a company obtains the information. If a company is uncertain about whether information is reportable, the company is permitted to investigate the matter. CPSC presumes that 10 days is sufficient to conduct “a reasonably expeditious investigation”, unless the company “can demonstrate that a longer period is reasonable.”
Most companies cannot complete an investigation in 10 days, but companies should prioritize their investigation and complete it as quickly as possible.
The “duty to report” does not begin when the company is able to confirm a defect or understand the failure mechanism, it begins as soon as the company has the necessary information when it becomes aware that the product “could” create a potential hazard.
CPSC and its regulation urges companies: “When in doubt, report.”
The only exception to this duty is where a company has “actual knowledge that” CPSC “has been adequately informed” of a potential hazard by another party. The “actual knowledge” should be “in writing” to protect the company’s records and decision.
-
The regulatory, financial, and reputational risks of not reporting to the CPSC are high
Failure to report information to the CPSC (which the CPSC later believes should have been reported) may be considered to be a violation of federal U.S. law. Failing to report information about a product can also lead to an investigation and, in some instances, civil penalties up to $120,000 for each violation and up to $17,150,000 for any related series of violations. In very rare circumstances, even criminal charges can be brought.
Always remember that the CPSC will have the benefit of 20/20 hindsight in their analysis if an serious incident with injury or death occurs after the date on which a company has important safety information in its possession and does not voluntarily report.
-
No. The CPSC is clear that companies “that obtain information indicating that their products present an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death should not wait for such serious injury or death to actually occur before reporting.” 16 CFR §1115.6
-
SaferProducts.gov is a CPSC-website where consumers and others can publicly post safety-related concerns about individual products.
Companies are notified of the reports and this information should be used by companies to evaluate whether their product is unsafe or non-compliant with a mandatory safety standard.
-
Yes, by law, companies whose products are reported to the CPSC by a consumer must be notified of the report and must be provided with an opportunity to review the comment.
By law, manufacturers are provided the opportunity to provide a public-facing comments in response to the consumer’s report. The manufacturer may also provide a private comment in response to the CPSC or can notify the CPSC that the consumer’s comment is materially inaccurate in order to request that the consumer report be removed or redacted, as appropriate.
-
No. A SaferProducts.gov report is for informational use. The information is provided to help other consumers may informed shopping decisions.
The information should be used by the manufacturer to determine whether it may have a “duty to report” a product to the CPSC, but the report itself does not automatically mean there is or will be a recall.
The information is also used by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to inform its own data and trends analyses. The CPSC, using this information and other information available to it, may open a new investigation into the safety of a product, if the product’s manufacturer has not already reported the product to the CPSC.
-
No. The CPSC is clear that comapnies “that obtain information indicating that their products present an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death should not wait for such serious injury or death to actually occur before reporting.” 16 CFR §1115.6
-
The Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) requires a manufacturer, importer, distributor, or retailer to report a product to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) when it has information about a product that “reasonably supports the conclusion” that
(i) the product fails to comply with “any ... rule, regulation, standard, or ban” enforced by the CPSC; or that
(ii) the product “contains a defect which could create a substantial product hazard,”; or that
(iii) the product creates an “unreasonable risk of serious injury or death.”
-
Companies are required to notify CPSC “immediately” upon receiving information that triggers a reporting obligation.
CPSC interprets “immediately” to be within 24 hours after a company obtains the information. If a company is uncertain about whether information is reportable, the company is permitted to investigate the matter. CPSC presumes that 10 days is sufficient to conduct “a reasonably expeditious investigation”, unless the company “can demonstrate that a longer period is reasonable.”
Most companies cannot complete an investigation in 10 days, but companies should prioritize their investigation and complete it as quickly as possible.
The “duty to report” does not begin when the company is able to confirm a defect or understand the failure mechanism, it begins as soon as the company has the necessary information when it becomes aware that the product “could” create a potential hazard.
CPSC and its regulation urges companies: “When in doubt, report.”
The only exception to this duty is where a company has “actual knowledge that” CPSC “has been adequately informed” of a potential hazard by another party. The “actual knowledge” should be “in writing” to protect the company’s records and decision.
-
The regulatory, financial, and reputational risks of not reporting to the CPSC are high
Failure to report information to the CPSC (which the CPSC later believes should have been reported) may be considered to be a violation of federal U.S. law. Failing to report information about a product can also lead to an investigation and, in some instances, civil penalties up to $120,000 for each violation and up to $17,150,000 for any related series of violations. In very rare circumstances, even criminal charges can be brought.
Always remember that the CPSC will have the benefit of 20/20 hindsight in their analysis if an serious incident with injury or death occurs after the date on which a company has important safety information in its possession and does not voluntarily report.
-
No. The CPSC is clear that companies “that obtain information indicating that their products present an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death should not wait for such serious injury or death to actually occur before reporting.” 16 CFR §1115.6